J. Child Psychol. Psychiat. Vol 41, No.1, pp 97-116, 2000
Child Abuse and Neglect and the Brain: A Review
Danya Glaser
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, U.K.
Developmental psychology and the study of behaviour and emotion have tended to be considered in parallel to the study of neurobiological processes. - this review explores the effects of child abuse and neglect on the brain, excluding nonaccidental injury that causes gross physical trauma to the brain.
It commences with a background summary of the nature, context, and some deleterious effects of omission and commission within child maltreatment. There is no post-maltreatment syndrome, outcomes varying with many factors including nature, duration and interpersonal context of the maltreatement as well as the nature of later intervention.
There then follows a section on environmental influences on brain development, demonstrating the dependence of the orderly process of neurodevelopment on the child's environment. Ontogenesis, or the development of the self through self-determination, proceeds in the context of the nature-nurture interaction. As a prelude to reviewing the neurobiology of child abuse and neglect, the next section is concerned with bridging the mind and the brain. Here, neurobiological processes, including cellular, biochemical, and neurophysiological processes, are examined alongside their behavioural, cognitive, and emotional equivalents and vice versa.
Child maltreatment is a potent source of stress and (lie stress response is therefore discussed in some detail. Evidence is outlined for the buffering effects of a secure attachment on the stress response.
The section dealing with actual effects on the brain of' child abuse and neglect discusses manifestations of the stress response including dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and parasympathetic and catecholamine responses. Recent evidence about reduction in brain volume following child abuse and neglect is also outlined.
Some biochemical, functional, and structural changes in the brain that are not reflections of the stress response are observed following child maltreatment. The mechanisms bridging about these changes are less clearly understood and may well be related to early and more chronic abuse and neglect affecting the process of brain development. The behavioural and emotional concomitants of their neurobiological manifestations are discussed. The importance of early intervention and attention to the chronicity of environmental adversity may indicate the need for permanent alternative caregivers, in order to preserve the development of the most vulnerable children.
Keywords: Attachment, brain development, child abuse, neglect. neurobiology, stress.
Abbreviations: ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone: ADHD: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; CRH: corticotropin-relealsing hormone; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; DBH: dopamine beta hydroxylase; ERPs: event-related potentials; HPA: hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; PTSD: post-traumatic stress disorder.
Comments
Wow!
Great find, Niels!
I have a question and a comment.
Q: When was this study completed, and did the UK study-team read Nancy Verrier's Primal Wound theory?
I ask because of the following comment: "This review is concerned with examining impairments of the developing brain attributable to, or caused by, abuse and neglect, excluding nonaccidental injury that causes gross physical injury to the brain....Most studies of attachment status in maltreated children have included physically abused and/or neglected children, and none have examined the attachment classification of sexually abused infants (Morton & Browne, 1998). This may be explained by the fact that in neglect, emotional abuse, and repeated physical abuse, especially of young children, the abuser and caregiver will, most likely, be the same person, whereas it is far more likely that the sexual abuser will not be the primary or sole caregiver of the child."
Immediately I thought: Unless, of course, the primary/sole caregiver is a complete stranger, as most Foster or Adoptive parents are to a baby.
"Stranger/separation Anxiety" is a normal cognitive development, however, imagine what happens to the mind of the baby being abused by New Strangers.
My comment is: I notice they used MRI imaging in their longitudinal study. I wonder how MEG imaging would compare in this sort of test-research. I believe it would be most interesting to compare these results with a group of babies, children and adults placed in foster-care/adoption.
Can you contact this group of scientists for PPL?