Problems viewing videos?
youtube.com
August 19, 2008
"I'm talking about my experiences with the Holding Therapy (after the methods of Jirina Prekop) who my mother did with me every day since I was 3 years old until I was 5. Sometimes even for several hours a day."
[Note what Holding Therapy did to the relationship she has with her mother.]
Comments
i wanted to add that this
i wanted to add that this woman is transcendently beautiful.
time and time again the victim exhibits so much compassion for humanity and grace.
the rest of the world is a fetid, sordid cesspool in comparison.
"Holding" is not as sweet as it sounds
Interestingly, on the bottom of her "About" page, in parentheses, you will find the following instruction: "(Please bring suitable clothing, a blanket and a small pillow.)"
Back in the states, we have people like Dr. Ronald S Federici, (an adoptive parent), making the following statements on adoption websites:
Meanwhile, note what Federici recommends doing with a small pillow:
Perhaps most disturbing to me is how desperate foster/adoptive parents are, and this seems to be the sort of therapy/treatment that reads best to them.
I have yet to read within any of the pages linked, any mention of brain imaging studies being taken and reviewed as part of the diagnostic-testing process done on those who require treatment. I'll be honest, as a parent, if my child's arm looked broken, I'd like to see the x-ray that shows the damage before I decide if I'm going to lay on my child's arm (for hours at a time), or not. You'd also have me asking questions like: How else can this be "fixed" or "stabilized"? and, "How long have you been doing this, because I'd like to talk with those who can tell me about their own treatment experiences". [I know, I'm really goofy that way ....I like second opinions from many different sources.]
Now, as luck would have it, Federici DOES have a testimonial page, which I read quickly. [It can be found here: http://www.drfederici.com/testimonial.htm] I especially liked the first one... this describes "a day of thorough testing", where a "difficult and hopeless" child sits through 10 hours of testing, which included 34 tests, a diagnostic interview, and then he (Federici) reviewed seven years of reports written on this child. A 37 page report was sent three weeks later to the parent, but it needed revision because the parent noticed a "few inaccuracies".
My point is simple... as a parent, I would what to know WHY my child was behaving a certain way, WHAT was causing it, IF there was something medical/physical causing the behavior problems, and HOW it could be fixed, helped or managed. I would also like to see before and after cases, so my decision would be an educated one, and not one made out of sheer desperation. If people like Federici were trained medical professionals, or affiliated with neurologists familiar with fMRI's (and other similar brain function tests/technology), I'd feel more comfortable knowing these holding theories were based on proven facts, and not trendy fashion.
After watching this video, and after reading many letters from those who have been hurt by this holding technique, I really have to wonder what's going on in the minds of people who think force and restraint will bring forth feelings of love and respect? I especially find it concerning how adoption websites and adoptive parents have rallied around therapists who believe force will bring forth bonding.
It's all about control...
What I have experienced with therapists is a total need for control; their way or you must take the highway. I
chose the highway after seeing and experiencing the controlling chit that went on. Textbooks are their bibles! NO child/adult is a carbon copy of another and can not be treated in such a way with success. Basics of talking do help most people, but
to savagely attack a child and call it therapy is insane.
If someone were to hold me down and call it love, I'd call it rape!
"I can be changed by what happens to me, I refuse to be reduced by it." M.A.
One Step Up From Bottom
Teddy
BBC - Should Federici's treatment be applied?
The BBC broadcasted a documentary on Federici' s controversial treatment:
The film follows two families, one British and one American, as they start to implement the treatment programme under supervision of Dr Federici himself. For at least a month, each child must stay within three feet of their parents 24 hours a day. They have to be totally compliant to whatever their parents want, and if they refuse to obey they are forced down to the floor and held there. Their bedrooms are stripped bare. They are allowed no life of their own. They are never left alone; they are not allowed to play with or see friends. Through a gradual process of reward and punishment the child will eventually be reintroduced to their toys, their peers and the outside world. The treatment can last for months.
At the end of this controversial regime the child's mind should have been literally re-programmed. Dr Federici claims this is the only way the child can progress to developing normal emotions. His critics believe this process may be damaging. But now, thousands of American families have been recommended by word of mouth to do the programme. The question is, does the treatment work and should it be applied?
The transcript of the programme can be read here (not nice reading)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/problemchild_transcript.shtml
Correct me if I'm wrong...
Did I read correctly?:
So in addition to "Holding Techniques", Federici adds the fun-twist of "withholding" to those who have already lost everything they once knew.
Why bother taking an orphan home... why not just adopt a child, and send the problem-child immediately to a private prison? At least in an institution, the child can sit among his own ilk in an unfurnished cell and share stories about the traveling experience, that is, assuming the child wasn't medicated the whole time, making the traveling much easier on the new-parents.
Oh wait... isn't that what Federici is trying to prevent: Institutional Autism?
Meanwhile, someone sent me the following in a private letter, asking if I would share it with others:
With therapists and treatments like that, who needs police?
Spock what Spock?
Apart from being cruel, paternalistic, manipulative towards children, Federici is also a sleaze here. I bet when people read: Remember Mr. Spock's famous Vulcan shoulder grip from Star Trek? Think of this. many of them will think of Dr. Spock instead of Mr. Spock, lending credibility to the rubbish he publishes.
[Throwing popcorn]
Either way, Federici scares me more than any science fiction movie. The damage he is causing is real, in ways I think very few are willing, (or daring enough), to imagine. After all, it's not just that he sells his own practice to those who are very desperate... but his books and ideas are promoted on so many adoption websites, making it look as if all these adoption groups/agencies endorse his appeal to adopt and treat these children, using HIS methods.
Shouldn't this concern people?