Playing Holding Therapy

Your browser is not able to display this multimedia content.

Problems viewing videos?
youtube.com

August 19, 2008
"I'm talking about my experiences with the Holding Therapy (after the methods of Jirina Prekop) who my mother did with me every day since I was 3 years old until I was 5. Sometimes even for several hours a day."

[Note what Holding Therapy did to the relationship she has with her mother.]

Comments

i wanted to add that this

i wanted to add that this woman is transcendently beautiful. 

time and time again the victim exhibits so much compassion for humanity and grace.
the rest of the world is a fetid, sordid cesspool in comparison.

"Holding" is not as sweet as it sounds

Dr. phil. Jirina PREKOP was born in 1929 and grew up in Moravia (the former CSR). She studied philosophy, psychology and pedagogics.

In 1970, after the collapse of the Prague Spring, she took refuge in the Federal Republic of Germany. She worked at the Olgahospital in Stuttgart, mainly in the range of developmental disorders, until her retirement. Due of her interest in autism, she took over Holding Therapy from Martha Welch (USA) under the personal scientific consultation of Nobel prize winner Niko Tinbergen (Oxford). She then linked this with the systemic approach of Bert Hellinger and developed it in her own terms into a medium for renewing love in the context of family bonds. She has written numerous professional articles and books, some of which (like e.g. her bestseller The Petty Tyrant) have been translated into17 languages. Together with Bert Hellinger, she published the book If You Knew, How Much I Love You. She is the first chairwoman of a friendly society that works to foster Holding as a therapy and way of life and is the head of an international training institute for Holding therapists. Other institutes, as well as a training centre in the Czech Republic, have been founded in her name (e.g. in Mexico City).

Jirina Pekop is very engaged in travelling and gives lectures and workshops all over the world (e.g. Mexico, South Africa, Argentina, Uruguay, Belgium, Spain, Czech Republic, etc.). Here, you can find a summary concerning two different workshops held by her.

Unfortunately, she does not speak English and therefore requires an interpreter (German or Czech).
From:  "Holding therapy according to Jirina Prekop", http://www.prekop-festhalten.de/en/prekop.html

Interestingly, on the bottom of her "About" page, in parentheses, you will find the following instruction:  "(Please bring suitable clothing, a blanket and a small pillow.)"

Back in the states, we have people like Dr. Ronald S Federici, (an adoptive parent), making the following statements on adoption websites:

 
"Traumatized children may need certain types of holding therapy to contain aggressive urges, but the majority has to be done in a reconstructive family modality. The entire thought of rebirthing, which was done to Candace Newmaker, was both bizarre, psychotic on the part of the therapist, and further traumatizing to the child while she was alive and before she met a most gruesome death according to the coroner. People who practice this type of treatment are often unlicensed and untrained, but make a lot of money by enticing the most needy and desperate families."  [From:  http://www.adopting.org/adoptions/dr-ronald-s-federici.html]

Meanwhile, note what Federici recommends doing with a small pillow:

If a pillow, jacket, or towel is available, place it under the child’s face because it is very important for the child to lie face down during the therapeutic hold to prevent spitting, biting or direct eye contact. It is often overwhelming and guilt-inducing for the parents when direct eye contact occurs with the child. In order to avoid the tendency to abandon the holding time technique, make sure the child is lying face down.
   While one of you jockeys your weight over the child’s buttocks and lower legs (thus straddling the child), the other parent lies across the child’s upper torso and pins the child’s arms down by the sides of the body … — Help for the Hopeless Child (Alexandria, Virginia: author, 2nd ed., 2003), p. 112 [From:  ACT, "In His Own Words - Ronal Federici", http://childrenintherapy.org/proponents/federici.html]

Perhaps most disturbing to me is how desperate foster/adoptive parents are, and this seems to be the sort of therapy/treatment that reads best to them.

I have yet to read within any of the pages linked, any mention of brain imaging studies being taken and reviewed as part of the diagnostic-testing process done on those who require treatment.  I'll be honest, as a parent, if my child's arm looked broken, I'd like to see the x-ray that shows the damage before I decide if I'm going to lay on my child's arm (for hours at a time), or not.  You'd also have me asking questions like:  How else can this be "fixed" or "stabilized"?  and, "How long have you been doing this, because I'd like to talk with those who can tell me about their own treatment experiences".  [I know, I'm really goofy that way ....I like second opinions from many different sources.] 

Now, as luck would have it, Federici DOES have a testimonial page, which I read quickly.  [It can be found here:  http://www.drfederici.com/testimonial.htm]  I especially liked the first one... this describes "a day of thorough testing", where a "difficult and hopeless" child sits through 10 hours of testing, which included 34 tests, a diagnostic interview, and then he (Federici) reviewed seven years of reports written on this child.  A 37 page report was sent three weeks later to the parent, but it needed revision because the parent noticed a "few inaccuracies".

My point is simple... as a parent, I would what to know WHY my child was behaving a certain way, WHAT was causing it, IF there was something medical/physical causing the behavior problems, and HOW it could be fixed, helped or managed.   I would also like to see before and after cases, so my decision would be an educated one, and not one made out of sheer desperation.  If people like Federici were trained medical professionals, or affiliated with neurologists familiar with fMRI's (and other similar brain function tests/technology), I'd feel more comfortable knowing these holding theories were based on proven facts, and not trendy fashion.

After watching this video, and after reading many letters from those who have been hurt by this holding technique, I really have to wonder what's going on in the minds of people who think force and restraint will bring forth feelings of love and respect?  I especially find it concerning how adoption websites and adoptive parents have rallied around therapists who believe force will bring forth bonding.

It's all about control...

What I have experienced with therapists is a total need for control; their way or you must take the highway.  I
chose the highway after seeing and experiencing the controlling chit that went on.  Textbooks are their bibles!  NO child/adult is a carbon copy of another and can not be treated in such a way with success.  Basics of talking do help most people, but
to savagely attack a child and call it therapy is insane.
If someone were to hold me down and call it love, I'd call it rape! 

"I can be changed by what happens to me, I refuse to be reduced by it." M.A.
 One Step Up From Bottom
Teddy

BBC - Should Federici's treatment be applied?

The BBC broadcasted a documentary on Federici' s controversial treatment:

The film follows two families, one British and one American, as they start to implement the treatment programme under supervision of Dr Federici himself. For at least a month, each child must stay within three feet of their parents 24 hours a day. They have to be totally compliant to whatever their parents want, and if they refuse to obey they are forced down to the floor and held there. Their bedrooms are stripped bare. They are allowed no life of their own. They are never left alone; they are not allowed to play with or see friends. Through a gradual process of reward and punishment the child will eventually be reintroduced to their toys, their peers and the outside world. The treatment can last for months.

At the end of this controversial regime the child's mind should have been literally re-programmed. Dr Federici claims this is the only way the child can progress to developing normal emotions. His critics believe this process may be damaging. But now, thousands of American families have been recommended by word of mouth to do the programme. The question is, does the treatment work and should it be applied?

The transcript of the programme can be read here  (not nice reading)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/problemchild_transcript.shtml

Correct me if I'm wrong...

Did I read correctly?:

 Dr Ron Federici is an American neuro-psychologist who has devised a treatment plan for even the most extreme cases of conduct-disordered children. He claims it is suitable no matter whether their behaviour lies in neurological or psychological problems. Dr Federici believes that his treatment guarantees two things. Firstly that there will be an 80% rate of improvement in most children. Secondly, that neither the parents nor the children will find it easy.   [From BBC's "Taming the problem child", http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2000/problemchild.shtml]

So in addition to "Holding Techniques", Federici adds the fun-twist  of "withholding" to those who have already lost everything they once knew.

Why bother taking an orphan home... why not  just adopt a child, and send the problem-child immediately to a private prison?  At least in an institution, the child can sit among his own ilk in an unfurnished cell and share stories about the traveling experience, that is, assuming the child wasn't medicated the whole time, making the traveling much easier on the new-parents.

 

Oh wait... isn't that what Federici is trying to prevent:  Institutional Autism?

....

Meanwhile, someone sent me the following in a private letter, asking if I would share it with others:

IN FEDERICI's OWN WORDS:

  • [The girl] needed a strong male role model. That's why she was acting out so much. … You know why she liked me? The first time she wouldn't come in. I dragged her in my office.  — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)
  • More often than not, the child will resist. At this point, one parent … applies gentle but firm pressure on the shoulder in a small "pinch" manner. (Remember Mr. Spock's famous Vulcan shoulder grip from Star Trek? Think of this.) … Next, you instruct the child to go to his or her knees and ultimately lie face down on the floor …Help for the Hopeless Child (2003), p. 110, detailing Federici's infamous "Take-Down Method"
  • You've got to be more manipulative than the kid. The best approach. — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)
  • [She] was cussing at me in Russian. I said, "Listen. You think that's bad, hear this." And I gave her a dose of her own medicine. — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)
  • [Tell] him he's going to stay longer and you're never going to relinquish rights. You're just going to keep him, declare him disabled and keep him home until he's 50. — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)
  • Forget school. If they never read, who cares. As long as their language improves. — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)
  • I'm a very manipulative person. The kids in my office that do this kind of crazy stuff. I always have a bag of popcorn. And so the kid is starting a tirade. I'm eating the popcorn. Popcorn. Yeah. They're on saying, "What are you doing?" And I say, "I'm eating popcorn." "Why's that?" "This is just like watching a science fiction movie." — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)
  • You know, a lot of my kids say, "Damn it, Pop, I want to go live somewhere else." And I said, "Why is that, Bill?" "It's not as bad as here." "That's all the reason why you're staying here, because this is where your home is. I'm not sending you out to any program, any treatment. You're not getting respite care." You know, my wife was an angel. She stayed at home, and I tell you, she was meaner than I could ever be. Because, you know what? She was consistent. Blindly consistent. — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)
  • From Russia. He's nine years old. Through a summer camp program. What are the chances of him having Attachment Disorder? I said, "One hundred percent. One hundred percent." — "…Treating Multi-Impaired Attachment Disorders" (2004)

With therapists and treatments like that, who needs police?

Spock what Spock?

Apart from being cruel, paternalistic, manipulative towards children, Federici is also a sleaze here. I bet when people read: Remember Mr. Spock's famous Vulcan shoulder grip from Star Trek? Think of this. many of them will think of Dr. Spock instead of Mr. Spock, lending credibility to the rubbish he publishes.

[Throwing popcorn]

Either way, Federici scares me more than any science fiction movie.  The damage he is causing is real, in ways I think very few are willing, (or daring enough), to imagine.  After all, it's not just that he sells his own practice to those who are very desperate... but his books and ideas are promoted on so many adoption websites, making it look as if all these adoption groups/agencies endorse his appeal to adopt and treat these children, using HIS methods.

Shouldn't this concern people?