
I was reading a piece on China's latest problem with adoption.
Earlier this week, the Chinese government held an adoption "open-day" to try to place some of the children with the tens of thousands of Chinese families who have registered for the opportunity to adopt.
The initial estimate of the number of orphans after the 7.9 magnitude earthquake struck in May was over 5,000. However, by June, the authorities claimed that there were only 1,019 children who had not been reunited with their parents.
Currently, only half of these children are available for adoption because they are under 14 and both their parents have been confirmed dead. The others must wait for two years for their missing parents to be declared as deceased.
However, the injuries suffered by many of the children have deterred Chinese parents from adopting them. Foreigners are banned from the adoption process, including residents of Hong Kong and Macau.
One couple in their late 30s, who flew from Changsha in Hunan to attend the open-day, complained to reporters in Sichuan that they could not find "a healthy child". They added: "We spent almost 10,000 yuan (£792) on travel."
Other parents said they were looking for children aged under three years old and good-looking and that none of the orphans met the criteria. The majority of the orphans are aged between 10 to 14.
An official at the Civil Affairs department in Sichuan said the process had also been complicated by a desire to give orphans to parents who lost their own children during the quake. "There are way too many of them [to be dealt with quickly]," he said, while declining to be named. [From: "Sichuan earthquake orphans fail to find home", http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/2631163/Sichuan-earthquake-orphans-fail-to-find-home.html]
In terms of finding safe-placement and appropriate health care for child victims, wouldn't a government funded Children's Home, staffed by medical professionals and social workers, be best for the children born and raised in China?
Comments
The majority of the orphans are aged between 10 to 14.
Being this old would make it very difficult to adjust to an adoptive home; and with the attitude of the others applying it
would seem a government funded Children's-Home would be a good start. With all the children who are waiting the two years to be labeled an orphan this should be a good option. It will be interesting to see how China handles this situation.
I only hope the children will be put first with every decision made; I've heard enough horror stories about their dying rooms.
"I can be changed by what happens to me, I refuse to be reduced by it." M.A.
One Step Up From Bottom
Teddy
Move over China, here comes Africa.
China is not alone when it comes to taking care of problems and handling their own people.
Read what's being passed from Africa, and ask "What's the difference between adoption and public assistance?"
One minute culture and family mean everything, the next minute I read a sentence that says those things can quickly be replaced by and through adoption. Since when does selling a child to strangers ever become a very good thing to do? Is it not better to help fund resources so these children do NOT have to lose more family and familiarity?
Take note of the last sentence of this article: "The problem of orphaned and vulnerable children is another milestone we have to deal with and adoption may be the way out." Adoption is the permanent way out of a problem situation.
Last I looked in my readings, adoption has caused far more problems than some dare to imagine or discuss.
"Adoption may be the way out". Is this how a country takes care of it's problems and children -- "just keep sending them OUT"?!?
Barnardos in Kenya????
And yes, a quick google:
http://www.kenyachildrenshome.org.uk/projects.html
Then click on Adoption Society and you get this:
http://www.kenyachildrenshome.org.uk/adoption.html
Adoption Society, one of the three adoption agencies in Kenya is located in the Thomas Barnardo House.
Changed business
Let's hope this "new opportunity" isn't like the old days when documents were kept, hidden and/or falsified, keeping children from their siblings and extended family members.
[See Robin's blogs to learn what Bernardo's was/is about.]
Balcraig Foundation?
I know Barnardos ran an orphanage in Kenya in the 1960/70s which was taken over by the locals, I'm not sure how much involvement Barnardos continued to have
Anyone know anything about the Balcraig Foundation and Nidos?
http://www.nidos.org.uk/directory/details.asp?id=112
More on Balcraig
This is all their website contains.... Nothing more, nothing less than an address...
http://www.balcraig.com/
and this is the founder:
Ann Heron Gloag
one of Scotland’s most powerful women and one of the world’s top-50 female entrepreneurs.
She adopted from Kenya
http://www.international-womens-month.co.uk/articles/ann_heron_gloag.html