Hotspots

Niels's picture

Yesterday I came across an article called Operation Zip Code, which revolved around the theme: where you live determines the quality of your health care. It mentions several of the medical practice hot-spots, where people are several times more likely to receive for example knee surgery than on average or where the hospitalization rates are much higher than in the rest of the country.

When I read the article I thought how that applies to child placement too. Unfortunately there aren't that many statistics maintained on child placement. So we have to do with little that we have.

In 2000 the US census, for the first time, asked about adoptive status. A true hot-spot based upon that data is Alaska, where 3.9% of the children under 18 in a household are adopted, compared to Puerto Rico, where that number is only 1.1%. The census also asked about step children and here the popularizing effect of former president  Clinton for that theme has worked, because Arkansas takes the lead with 8.5% of the children in a household being stepchildren. The lowest figure can be found in the District of Columbia, where this number is 2.1%. In general the percentage of stepchildren in a household is much higher in the South than anywhere else, with the North East having the lowest figures.

Another source of information is the Administration for Children & Family of the US Department of Health and Human Services, which maintain statistics about public agency adoption in the US. Here the District of Columbia clearly takes the lead, with Hawaii as a close runner up, while Puerto Rico and Maryland close the list.

The Child Welfare Information Gateway has all sorts of information about adoption and foster care, including lists of licensed agencies per state. Though the information is not all that accurate, the number one position of Pennsylvania, remains undisputed even after further perusal. With 206 agencies, Pennsylvania has by far the largest number of private adoption agencies in the USA. Especially in and around Philadelphia is a real concentration of agencies an influence that is even noticeable on the other side of the Delaware, where quite some agencies seem to like Cherry Hill, New Jersey as their domicile.

When we look abroad, Sweden stands out as the country with the most adoptions per capita and Guatemala stands out as the country where most children per capita get adopted from. That position might soon be taken over by Ethiopia, where the adoption market is soaring, while Guatemalan adoption is now quickly declining. China maintains the biggest export country in absolute numbers.

Unlike the article this comparison is loosely inspired by, I have little information about the reasons behind these figures. The high number of agencies in Pennsylvania can be explained by very lax regulations for incorporating agencies, but as of yet I have to hear a rational behind the high number of adoptions in Alaska.

Hot-spots come and go. I already hinted at the position of Guatemala, but also in the US things change constantly. Little over twenty years ago, US congress was so worried about the situation in baby broker business in South Carolina, there was even a congressional hearing about it. At the time articles South Carolina's Booming Baby Business made the headlines, while nowadays no-one talks about the Palmetto State anymore.

Comments

Hotspot visibility

After I wrote this post, I decided to add locative information to the abuse cases we have collected and used that for a map. That way the hot-spots of abuse in adoptive families are immediately visible. Striking are the high incidents around the Great Lakes and in Florida. Does anyone have an explanation for that?

"Visibility"

The very sad and tragic truth about abuse-cases is knowing the cases that make the papers had to be absolutely horrific in nature, otherwise there would be no mention of them to the media.

Meanwhile, I have heard "normal, every-day ordinary" abuse situations from adoptees that would make the average person's skin crawl.

When a family member is determined to keep a secret, you'd be amazed how horrible the hidden truth becomes... and these are the very cases and situations that will never make the news or map. 

It's revolting to me that there are social-workers getting paid to meet targets and quotas through the use of false allegations of parental abuse, yet there are children being placed among abusers, and ignored because a new-match has to be made.  If child-placement isn't a self-serving industry, I don't know what is. 

 

iceberg

Whenever I am working on the abuse cases list and google for more information there usually are several links leading to forums that discuss the related news articles. In almost ever case there is an adoptee (and we're not talking about the same one over and over again), testifying having been abused by adoptive parents or siblings. The latter is probably the most under-reported form of abuse. It has hardly received any attention so far and I know of no study that investigates this form of abuse.

So the list as I have said in several posts, is only a tip of the iceberg. Most of the cases on the list deal with situations where children die or end up in the hospital with severe injuries. Emotional abuse never reaches the news and sexual abuse only rarely.