Activism

almost_human's picture
  1. Is anyone current on legislation underway to change adoption practices in America?
  2. what ARE the current laws?
  3. is there one particular case we can use as our poster child?
  4. is anyone out there a lawyer?
  5. can we create some child advocacy for adoptees?
  6. how can we speak to more than just our choir?
  7. what are social service guidelines regarding home visits?
  8. what is the screening process for prospective parents?
  9. do agencies have lobbyists?
  10. how can we unite and protect future adoptees?
  11. can we create a network of sites such as this so various groups can communicate and organize?
  12. what groups/organizations/sites exist about adoptee rights?
  13. Is there a data base of statistics on adoption?
  • international
  • mixed race
  • foster families
  • abuse reports
  • reunions
  • illegal adoptions
  • child trafficking
  • adoption agency violations and regulations
  • access to files
  • closed adoptions vs. open
  • religious vs. secular
  • suicides
  • homicides
  • drugs
  • prostitution
  • incarceration

I like to roll up my sleeves and get to work about anything I'm passionate about.  I'm not totally against adoptions, but the current system is as holey as swiss cheese.

Comments

Initial Research Resource Findings

RE:  Item 8. - Standards for Adoption Practices

RE:  Item 12 - Adoptee Rights

RE:  Item 13 - Statistics

  • National and State-wide Adoption and Abuse statistics available here from the Children's Bureau of the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services
  • Adoptiion Statistics possibly the same information?  Child Welfare Information Gateway Adoption Statistics


ok!  that should keep us busy for several weeks...

I'll add more as I find time.

answering the list

Excellent points you bring forward. It's good to see such a list. Many of these questions have been addressed on this website, but never in such a concise manner.

1. Is anyone current on legislation underway to change adoption practices in America?

As I have pointed out in a post that is also called Activism, much of the activism is focussed towards open records, which, despite being a valid right to fight for, leads, in my opinion, away from the broader picture: the malfunctioning child placement industry. As far as law reform in America goes, it is only the open record movement that actually has achieved something. Of course there are organizations like Ethica and PEAR, which aim to change adoption legislation, but so far I haven't seen much effectiveness.

2. what ARE the current laws?

Alas there is not just one law, or one set of laws, but 51 of them. There are federal laws, such as the Adoption and Safe Families Act, but adoption is very much a state regulated affair. That is also one of the problems adoption reform faces. In order to promote change, it has to be done 51 times over again. Cornell University maintains an online collection of all the state laws.

3. is there one particular case we can use as our poster child?

That's an interesting point. There are several approaches possible here, because there are several issues at the same time. We can address the issue of safety in adoptive families, for which all of the abuse cases we collected can be expemplary. We can address the issue of internation adoptees, being deported, because they have commited a crime. We can address the issue of child trafficking in international adoption and if we look beyond adoption and take child placement as broad as I think we should, there is the complete mess called foster care. Far to many people phasing out of this system end up in prison or become homeless or we could focus in on the use of medication in foster care. There are many angles to this and probably a few I haven't even thought about mentioning.

4. is anyone out there a lawyer?

yes we have at least one such member.

5. can we create some child advocacy for adoptees?

I would like to see that broadened to include advocacy for the adult adoptee. I believe our issues don't stop the moment we are no longer small and cute.

6. how can we speak to more than just our choir?

This is a very important point, but also a very difficult one. Having spent time on various forums on the internet, I have come to the conclusion that there is not even such a thing as "our choir". Many adoptees are caught up in their search and reunion issues. for many their main motivation to seek contact with fellow adoptees. This is, I believe, also the main reason the open record movement is the most successful reform movement coming from adoptees. To put it bluntly and maybe some will hate me for saying this, but many adoptees live with their head up their ass. It's sad to notice there is a bigger adoption reform movement from (prospective) adoptive parents who have been screwed by the industry than there is from adoptees.

7. what are social service guidelines regarding home visits?

Again this is very much organized on a state by state basis, which is very risky, especially when inter-state adoption takes place. The Masha Allen case is a prime example of how bad things can go with regards to home visits.

8. what is the screening process for prospective parents?

Here too state laws dictate the minimum requirements and the rest depends on practices of the agency involved. For some agencies, religion is an important factor in deciding the fitness of prospective adoptive parents, others are known to make their decisions mainly based on the affluence of the people wanting to adopt.

9. do agencies have lobbyists?

Yes they have. There is of course the National Council for Adoption, which lobbies for christian adoption agencies, most noteably for LDS family services and Bethany Christian Services. Then there is the Joint Council on International Children's Services, which lobbies for many of the adoption agencies that operate internationally. Focus on Adoption is another lobby groups, which as far as I can tell is mainly geared towards as unethical as possible adoption practices. The Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, though often in the news with reports that are critical towards current adoption practices, they are an organization that is funded by the industry itself and founded by Spence-Chapin. Politically important is the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute, which consists of 51 senators an 125 representatives, that promote adoption. Both candidates for the presidency are member of the CCAI. Finally there is of course the Adoption Awareness Month.

10. how can we unite and protect future adoptees?

I think the way to achieve this is take this internationally. There is a trend to offshore coersion and other unethical practices to third world countries. In all rich countries the numbers of domestic adoption have dropped, in Europe more dramatically so than in the USA. So we need to be alert on what happens all around the world. At the moment our focus should be on Africa, Ethiopia in particular, since the numbers are soaring there. In many Asian countries the standards of living have improved enough over the years, international adoption should no longer be an option. In Latin and South America, many countries have closed their borders for international adoption, because of the corruption involved. So Africa is the growth market at the moment. If we want to protect future adoptees we should look in that direction. How we can unite is another important question. As PPL we chose to look as internationally as possible, that's why many of our members are from countries other than the USA.

11. can we create a network of sites such as this so various groups can communicate and organize?

I think this very important. Some things can only be achieved at a local level, like ballot 58 in Oregon demonstrates. Other things can only be achieved by making sure we are a voice at the Hague Convention, which requires an international approach.

12. what groups/organizations/sites exist about adoptee rights?

When it comes to adoptee rights in the USA, Bastard Nation immediately comes to mind, while in the UK, Fassit is most active in this area. In the Netherlands, United Adoptees International is an organization known for its adoption activism, carried by adoptees.

13. is there a data base of statistics on adoption?

In the USA, no. Sweden seems to have pretty good statistical information and several longitudinal studies have been performed there. The best statistical information about adoption in the USA dates from before 1975, when the collection of such information stopped.



It's good to see you want to roll up your sleeves, because there is a lot of work that can be done and I for one am more than willing to do my part. You can find most posts about adoption reform here.

brushes with beaurocracy

Sorry this will be disorganized and off the cuff - many fish to fry today.

in my own experience, i don't remember even once a social worker coming to check up on me!  perhaps i just forgot, but i remember all other unusual visits by strangers to our extremely cloistered household.  seems like there should be multiple visits, and often.

i am trying to compose, on the side, some writing about the kind of abuse that occurs in superficially normal appearing households.  these types of repressed households are masters at keeping up appearances - surely there are some psychological tip-offs that can raise red flags.  that's why i wanted to see what the 100 questions and psychological review process was about.  I mean, do they hand them a multiple choice form?  Can any monkey pass one of these reviews?  Obviously, the answer must be yes. 

Adoptions should be capped in direct proportion to how many caseworkers can adequately monitor child placements! 

that's just sick there are adoption lobbyists.  how can children lobby for themselves?

what is the current position of social work organizations on adoption, now that there is a historic pattern of abuse and neglect?
despite there being 50+1 states, the federal government still has some control via the distribution of funding to states.   surely there is some bargaining chip the feds have...
can adoptees organize to educate future social workers?  can we help them obtain research grants for more comprehensive studies?
can we take an inverse approach to the adoption issue by working to support preservation of birth families?

i think you're right that going international is the right approach.  there needs to be an orphans bill of rights drafted. 
(is that what they have already in the EU?)

Rolling Up Sleeves


let's:

  1. assemble links to all adoptee organizations in the world
  2. compose a mission statement about unification
  3. ask everyone to contribute to an on-line clearinghouse / web ring / center for activism / mailing list
  4. have a news feed
  5. determine site map and organization
  6. get legal counsel and other expert counsel
  7. determine who our allies ; political, professional, and popular, could be
  8. canvas those potential allies
  9. brainstorm and initiate reform campaigns
  10. pick a poster case and try and take it to the house as a bill

and, (don't hate me for this) we really need to study when adoption is appropriate and what models could work and to what extent, etc., otherwise we will have zero credibility

what'll we call it? 

I'd be happy to contribute the band width and pay for the domain.

Overcoming apathy

> assemble links to all adoptee organizations in the world

If you find one in England (or the rest of the UK) let me know (one that does what it says on the can)

There's a lot of adoptee apathy hereabouts, there was a series of consultations here when the various regulations and practice guidelines associated with the Adoption and Children Bill/Act 2002 were being written, I could find you the exact stats on who answered if you like but generally adoptees and natural relatives numbered about 30 (in a jurisdiction where 550,000 'out of family' adoption have taken place). How could we overcome that kind of apathy in the UK?

*

Apathy in the UK

Well Robin, seeing your presence here, I think you make up for a lot of the apathy in the UK, which by the way could make a great Sex Pistol's song.

On a more serious note. I have noticed Brits with an activistic heart towards adoption tend to be more present on American than on the UK websites. What do you think is are the causes of that apathy?

Maybe it's Repression

Or Denial

I know I personally wanted NOTHING to do with ANYTHING adoption related until my nervous breakdown at 44.

I always had this - I can get through this - kind of attitude, and the only way to keep that attitude was to deny this was a huge problem and bottle it up.

and you know the British Isles are notorious for people living lives of quiet desperation...

maybe if we could get into the tabloid papers somehow!
Then they would come!

Denial

 I was in denial too ..
And until a year ago, I didn' t want to hear about adoption or anything related to it.
Blogs and websites can be powerful. I'm an example.

The problem is...

establishing unity, within an international population.  When Americans discuss "adoption reform", most see this as an open-records issue.  Meanwhile, Americans forget just how many children have been and continue to be IMPORTED from other countries that have different child placement systems.  Face it folks, adoption is a thriving industry, one that is not limited to American borders or American corruption.

All one has to do is compare adoption, foster care and child placement practices to see, the real issue that keeps hurting families and is in desparate need of radical reform is not adoption, but CHILD TRAFFICKING.  After all, historically speaking, how have unwed mothers and their bastard children been treated within "morally-guided" societies?  [For a very small sample, please review our Historical Preservation pages: http://poundpuplegacy.org/node/4189  ]

Once a reader realizes the long-history behind the policies and proceedures used to remove or solve the "unwanted" ilk of society, it soon becomes very clear where "special interest" really is.  Believe me, it's NOT towards the well-being of parents or their children!

The simple truth is, adoption reform cannot exist unless the entire world agrees upon a universal standard of care for children whose parents and extended families are absolutely incapable of raising a child.  This reform must include foster care, children's homes, orphanages and the services that operate EACH.  Furthermore, if a group wants adoption reform, that group must be educated about the historical facts behind child placement and prepare for CPR:  Child Placement Reform.  Keep in mind, this will be a fight against global forces funded and supported by many industries (child-care, parenting, sex, charitable, medical and of course prescription drugs...)... and these forces are protected by government agents who profit from these industries.  No small beans, is it? 

The rights of a child is also a fight for family-protection and preservation because child-safety has to be taught to more than just a focus group that bends to very strong political and religious machines.

Welcome to the high-cost of radical reform.

 

Radical reform means

Radical reform means to me that the demand side has to be taken out.

Which means also the MONEY.

But also that those who want to care for other people's children will mean just that: care for someone else's child. No change of birth certificates, no pretending. WIth proper guardianship regulations that can still mean sufficient stability and continuity for the child.

At least that will be a start.

Great idea!!!

I really like your enthusiasm and would love to pick up on your ideas.

Much of what you suggest we can start off from this website. Assembling links to all adoptee organizations I can make a setup for. This website is highly configurable and I am capable of doing the necessary configuration. It won't take me more than an hour.

In the mean time we can work on a mission statement for unification, which we can propose to the various groups and organizations and ask for feed back and recommendation.

An on-line clearinghouse / web ring / center for activism / mailing list we can again start from here and once it starts picking up, we can always decide to move it to another domain. Same for news feeds.

The rest we have to do while brainstorming, but I am really happy to see the energy you are presenting.

I don't hate you for suggesting we should study the appropriateness of adoption, cause there could be cases where it does apply. Coming from the Netherlands I can tell you, those situations can be quite rare. Over here domestic adoption has dropped to about 20 cases each year, on a population of over 16 million (which is somewhere in between the population of Pennsylvania and that of Florida). So the necessity of adoption is pretty debatable, though forms of child placement will always be needed, whether that should be in the form of adoption, remains a question.

awesome! but

awesome!

I would disagree with you about one thing, though...

consistency and name recognition is really important - (moving url's isn't condusive to that)
in addition, PPL isn't a very powerful moniker to be recognized under. 

I think a name is really important, and that we should acquire the domain for it from the very beginning.  It could just be a placeholder until we get everything organized here...

hope

i don't think its' necessary for everyone in pop culture to fully understand the entirity and complexity of what we need to begin making change.

you merely need to appeal to their emotions, and you leave the minutia to those willing to go through the pain and effort and the paperwork. 

we can appeal to pop culture through our stories, campaigns, and poster cases, as well as any popular personalities willing to come forward and support us.

in addition, i believe that we can analyze all of the adoptee organizations and find many fundamental commonalities - a win for one of us is a win for all, so we might as well all back each other's efforts and combine forces where our issues overlap.

Now,

how can we find out who on this site wants to put real effort in this and how can we delegate tasks?

also, does anybody know of any famous adopted personalities who might be convinced?