Is Amsterdam's wild-life going up in smoke and getting bagged for good?

New drug policing puts squeeze on Amsterdam

Geraldine Baum, Los Angeles Times
Sunday, January 6, 2008

AMSTERDAM, Netherlands - The vacation sort of just flew by.

After dropping their packs at a hostel, Ryan Ainsworth and his buddy Richie Bendelow found a shop selling 500 herbal potions that promised to make them high and happy in 500 ways. But the young British tourists went right for the hallucinogenic mushrooms, packaged in clear plastic containers just like the ordinary ones at the greengrocer back home.

The pair took the tips sheet that advised first boiling the mushrooms into a tea "to speed up the effect." It also warned against taking them with hard drugs or alcohol but that "a marijuana joint is no problem and can give you a positive, relaxing feeling."

These guys didn't need advice - they'd cut loose before in this haven of libertine values and elegant canals. After forking over $24, they made their way to the lush Vondelpark and between them gobbled up the entire box.

The next day, as they were leaving a popular coffeehouse where they'd bought half a gram of marijuana, they had little to say about the afternoon in the park. "Hey, it's holiday in Holland," said Ainsworth, a 22-year-old kayak instructor. "Anything goes."

But it may be last call for drugs, sex and live-and-let-live in the Netherlands, one of the most famously broad-minded countries in the world.

Prostitution, abortion, euthanasia, same-sex marriage and magic mushrooms have long been legal here, and soft drugs such as marijuana technically are illegal but are sold with official sanction in small amounts in "coffeehouses." In recent years, however, uneasiness over an influx of Muslim and black immigrants as well as a lifestyle that many believe has gone too far have shifted the Dutch mood away from tolerance and infinite permissiveness.

In 2006, parliament stopped coffeehouses from selling alcohol if they sell marijuana; now legislators are negotiating to have them located at least 250 yards from schools. This year, a ban on the sale of hallucinogenic mushrooms goes into effect.

"I've been in this business 15 years, and we have never felt so much pressure," said Olaf Van Tulder, manager of the Green House, part of a chain of popular coffeehouses owned by a Dutchman whom High Times magazine has dubbed the "King of Cannabis."

It was only 10 on a recent midweek morning, but already the dealers at the marijuana bar in the back of the Green House were busily weighing marijuana on a small digital scale, and most of the tables were taken by customers rolling joints.

Almost nobody was drinking coffee.

Two young Italians, who already looked a bit wasted, raised two fingers each and pointed to the most expensive hash on the menu, the Dutch Ice-Olator Supreme at $51.80 a gram. Eduardo, the affable dealer, poured out 2 grams each into a bag, showed the Italians the price on a calculator and waved them off with "Ciao, babies!"

Business is good, sure, but the daily struggle with a new drug policing unit has Van Tulder feeling under siege. "Even if there's just a motorbike double-parked out front, they'll shut us down," he says.

Like most natives, Van Tulder, 35, doesn't use marijuana often, but he is concerned that conservative politics will kill Dutch culture: "Listen, these people want to put their religion in society, and I think Amsterdam is dying because of it. It's nice to escape a little from reality."

Joel Voordewind grew up in this city, reveling in the punk music scene and playing drums in a band called No Longer Music (because it was so loud). But he never felt comfortable with Amsterdam's drug use and prostitution and as a child avoided its red-light district "because you'd get in trouble there."

Now this tall, boyish-looking son of an evangelical pastor is 42 and a member of parliament. His Christian Union Party, which bases much of its policy on biblical doctrine, is trying to remake a government that in his estimation has been morally adrift. Although his party controls only two of 16 ministries, it aligned with liberals to fight for refugees, poor families and the environment while also condemning homosexuality, euthanasia, abortion and youthful experimentation "with everything."

"The people are fed up with the lazy attitude of government. We call it, 'If it's forbidden, we let it go.' Like soft drugs. It's forbidden, but we look the other way," he said, sipping coffee in a bar at the Amsterdam train station. "We have a lot of that kind of policy, and it has given people the feeling that the government was telling them to go their own way."

Although tolerance and diversity have long been a matter of national pride, a series of shocking events has made the Dutch more open to "a firm government with outspoken norms and values," he said.

The killings of maverick populist politician Pim Fortuyn in 2002 and filmmaker Theo Van Gogh two years later, both of whom fanned fears of Islamic extremism, have traumatized this predominantly white, Christian country.

The outward-looking Dutch welcomed the newcomers - and their mosques and Islamic schools - but have grown less tolerant toward those who don't share their brand of tolerance. And they're also asking themselves why they're inviting tourists to get stoned in their parks and allowing graceful neighborhoods to devolve into lurid Disneylands with sex clubs and massage parlors.

Last month, Amsterdam's mayor and City Council unveiled a plan to squeeze out brothels and escort services by forcing their owners to apply for permits and by raising the minimum age of prostitutes to 21 from 18. The city also is spending $37 million to buy out a landlord who owns a quarter of the city's buildings where nearly naked women pose behind display "windows," red light literally flashing over their heads.

If the City Council gets its way, windows featuring women for sale will give way to windows featuring women's clothes for sale, and historic buildings will be restored to attract upmarket hotels and restaurants, with the remaining brothels clustered on just a few streets.

"The romantic picture of the area is outdated if you see the abuses in the sex industry, and that is why the council has to act," Amsterdam Mayor Job Cohen, a member of the Labor Party, said at a news conference announcing the changes. "We don't want to get rid of prostitution, but we do want to cut crime significantly."

Local politicians across the Netherlands have concluded that by legalizing prostitution in 2000, they opened up their cities to international crime organizations trafficking in women, children and hard drugs. The authorities want to wipe out the crime and are also weary of boozy weekend trippers ogling prostitutes and buying illegal drugs on the streets.

In fact, these openly seedy scenes come as a bit of a surprise in this beautiful city full of old churches. In the central neighborhood, the streets are lined with 17th- and 18th-century buildings, many with stores quaintly selling clogs and wheels of cheese, or old bookshops attracting students.

But turn a corner and there in a window like a mannequin come to life is a young Polish woman spilling out of her bikini. Above her window is a number and the red-neon tube light. As she shifts poses, with her shoulders back and chin out, she tries to remain perched on a high stool.

A few windows down are two older-looking Dominican women dressed in matching white underwear and sharing a fat joint; they look bored and frozen. Nearby, a girl in a black leather bathing suit - she's Dutch, with long, blond hair - is talking on a cell phone and at the same time winking and blowing kisses at a clutch of Russian men.

Mariska Majoor, who runs the Prostitution Information Center, began walking these streets 20 years ago, when almost all the prostitutes were Dutch and the trade was less organized. She eventually left the business and started the center, a small storefront next to one of Amsterdam's oldest churches. It operates, more or less, like other tourist gift shops, but sells dozens of sex-related items, such as refrigerator magnets featuring buxom prostitutes.

Majoor, now 37, is convinced that the new concern about the exploitation of women and crime is simply a ploy to see these areas gentrified and, from her perspective, only means that more prostitutes will be forced to work in unsafe conditions.

Voordewind would like to see his native city's red-light district radically changed. He recently proposed turning it into an artists' colony like Paris' Montmartre. He'd have the city buy the remaining windows, restore the buildings to their original beauty, and open them for artists' studios and galleries.

"The district is now a tourist attraction, not because of the nice buildings, but because of the windows," he said. "It's a very sad situation. ... I want it completely changed."

Comments

First-hand experience

I recently visited The Netherlands, and visited Amsterdam.  I was amazed by many things, tollerance and new-ways of teaching my own kids was indeed among the two top things on the list of things I came back to the States, after seeing how things are done there.  There's an excellent article written, at http://www.dutchamsterdam.nl/171-why-is-amsterdam-so-tolerant, and it reads as follows:

The Netherlands — that’s Holland to most Americans — is known the world over for its progressive attitude. Dutch policies on recreational drugs, prostitution, same-sex marriage and euthanasia, are among the most liberal in the world.

The sale and use of soft drugs, in so-called coffeeshops, has been tolerated for years.

Prostitution is legalized. The Netherlands has allowed same-sex marriage since April 1, 2001, the first country to do so.

Holland was also the first country in the world to legalize euthanasia.

Dutch Girl... 

Souvenir sold at the ‘Wallenwinkel’ - a shop run by the Prostitution Information Center.
© Copyright DutchAmsterdam.nl.

Pragmatic Tolerance

Are the Dutch really that progressive?

First and foremost, they are pragmatic.

Take prostitution. The Dutch tend to think that it will happen anyway, whether they prohibit it or not.

So they legalise it - to prevent prostitution from going underground, to have access to the prostitutes, promote condoms and hygiene and to prevent mistreatment of women forced to work as prostitutes.

The logic is simple - tolerate it, rather than prohibit it and subsequently lose control.

The same line of reasoning applies to soft drugs and euthanasia: people will smoke soft drugs, so it might be better to educate them about it openly; doctors will be faced with requests from people who would prefer to end their suffering, so perhaps better be realistic about it.
- Source: Yashe Lange, BBC, Apr. 11, 2001

In the Netherlands this approach is known as gedogen:

Illegal, But Not Illegal

Gedogen is a Dutch verb that cannot be properly translated. It roughly means ‘tolerated,’ but in a wider and different sense of the word. It is used of a situation or activity that technically is illegal, but which is actively tolerated as a matter of government policy — since everyone knows the issue (say, prostitution or the use of soft drugs, can not be legislated away).

In short, gedogen is something that is illegal, but not illegal.

The gedoogcultuur, literally “a culture of permissiveness,” goes hand-in-hand with the poldermodel — an approach in which efforts are made to reach a very broad national consensus on important issues.

It is said that the name and model derive from a feature of the Dutch landscape. A polder is land behind a dike. As far back as the Middle Ages, people who lived behind dikes — at below sea level — had to cooperate with each other when there is a danger of flooding.

Demise of Pillarization

The Netherlands has a long tradition of social tolerance. In the 18th century, while the Dutch Reformed Church was the state religion, Catholicism and Judaism were tolerated.

Marijuana Seeds for Sale 

This is a detail of a stand seen during the recent Queen’s Day free-market in Amsterdam. Sensi Seeds operates the nearby Hash, Marijuana & Hemp Museum.
© Copyright DutchAmsterdam.nl.

In the late 19th century this Dutch tradition of religious tolerance transformed into a system of ‘pillarization,’ in which religious groups coexisted separately and only interacted at the level of government.

Pillarization (verzuiling in Dutch) organized society into several smaller segments or “pillars” according to different religions or ideologies, which operate separately from each other in a non-racial form of apartheid.

In many respects, these pillars formed the building-blocks of a tolerant, relatively diverse, non-confrontational society.

At the same time this approach unintentionally also led to intolerance. For instance, your religion influenced which supermarket or bakery you frequented. You wouldn’t want your purchase of sugar to financially aid the wrong religion.

These pillars all had their own social institutions: their own newspapers, broadcasting organisations, political parties, trade unions, schools, hospitals, building societies, universities, scouting organisations and sports clubs.

Some companies even only hired personnel of a specific religion or ideology.

This led to a situation where many people had no personal contact with people from another pillar.
- Source: Pillarization, Wikipedia. Last accessed, May 4, 2007

After the Second World War some began to doubt the pillarization system, and during the sixties, the pillars largely broke down.

Television, the hippie movement, and the increase in mobility — travel and interaction with other people — brought the realization that people in the various pillars weren’t all that different.

Increases in education and wealth also meant that more and more people gained independence from the straight-jackets of the pillars.

Music and the hippie movement (Amsterdam, for many the start and finish of the India trail, became a mecca for hippies) both reflected and contributed to the changes in society.

The leveling effects of the Sixties were more radical in the Netherlands than in other countries. Consensus decision making (which in later years became known as the poldermodel) led to the gedoogcultuur. The official tolerance that resulted has earned Holland, and Amsterdam in particular, the reputation as a place where anything goes — the world capital of relativism.

Nowadays — while less than a third of Dutch people attend church — some conservative religious denominations still have a form of pillarization. In addition, the tendency of Muslim immigrants to form a ‘parallel society’ in their host country is also considered a throwback to the system of pillarization.

Still, even during the years of pillarization — and long before the poldermodel and gedoogcultuur — tolerance was a hallmark of Dutch society. The reason? Money.

Trade Trumps Ideology or Religion

This pragmatic tolerance has a historical reason, too.

Amsterdam is traditionally a city of immigrants. Jews from Spain and French protestants found a safe haven, centuries ago.

More importantly, Amsterdam is a city where trade has always been more important than ideology or religion - overly strong views would only hamper relations.

That attitude is still visible today. Moreover, being small and internationally-orientated, the Dutch quite simply had to be able to associate with different cultures, sail the seas, learn other languages and accept differences. Hence the tolerant attitude.

Sex at a young age, is another good example of the same tolerance. Undesirable according to many, but treated pragmatically by the Dutch.

Kids will have sex, whether you like it or not. So, at 12 years old, they get education and can go to a clinic to get contraceptives. Anonymously, if they want. Their parents won’t know.

Does this stimulate Dutch adolescents to have sex at a younger age, as critics might claim? No. Dutch youngsters have their first sexual experience relatively late. And more importantly, the number of abortions and unwanted pregnancies among teenagers is the lowest in the world.
- Source: Yashe Lange, BBC, Apr. 11, 2001

Amsterdam Today

To date, the Netherlands remains a tolerant nation, exemplified in Amsterdam’s freewheeling nature.

That doesn’t mean there are no rules and regulations. Far from it. Indeed, tolerance itself is heavily regulated. Prostitution, for example, is considered a business venture. Prostitutes pay income tax, must observe safe sex rules, and must be at least 18 years of age. (Clients must be at least 16, the age of consent).

Likewise, coffeeshops must be licensed, and are subject to a set of rules (e.g. no advertising, no sale to people under the age of 18, and no hard drugs sales on the premises).

Just about the only thing the Dutch won’t tolerate is intolerance — such as displayed by a small, but growing movement of Islamic extremists. After the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh, by an Islamic fanatic, this has become the subject of much discussion: What does a society that is tolerant of minorities do when it is confronted with a minority that is violently intolerant?

In an upcoming article we will take a look at this and other challenges to Dutch tolerance.

© Copyright: DutchAmsterdam.nl [What that actually means..

http://www.dutchamsterdam.nl/171-why-is-amsterdam-so-tolerant

In My mind, it means there should be room for discussion so patterns of abuse and misuse don't keep happening.  Clearly prohibition doesn't work, rules and rugulations must be instituted, for the safekeeping of children, but where does the line get drawn so adults are free to do what they want, so they are not treated like animals or children?

Where is my chrystal ball?

Coming from the Netherlands myself, I really enjoyed reading the above article. Of course it is mainly about prostitution and drugs, like most articles in foreign news papers. I can understand for someone not coming from the Netherlands, our attitude towards those "illegal" activities is confusing and therefore gains most attention, but in the mean time there is more to the country than our permissive legislation. It may be a surprise to some, but we do have families here, people going to work, children going to school, ill people going to hospitals. In that sense the Netherlands is not all that different from most other rich countries and the daily worries of people here are much the same as those of people in other countries.

It is true, we seem to choose different approaches to some of issues we encounter than most other countries. For centuries we have been deeply divided between the various religions, having substantial factions of Roman Catholics, Jews and the 741 different Protestant churches. Since no single faction has ever been able to form a majority everything here has to be decided by concensus. Unlike the US, where two parties take turns being in power, here we are faced with many parties having to form coalitions. Since no single moral stance can dominate the discourse, the eventual political outcome is mostly pragmatic.

As long as I can remember there has been opposition against this pragmatism from various religious groups. Though the influence on politics is usually more in word than in deed. Christian politicians usually want to prohibit more than socialists and liberals, but when it comes down to it, they usually postpone further liberalisation, rather than introduce more prohibition.

It's weird to see how our various governments usually closely follow the administrations in the US. Since the start of the century we have a predominantly christian government, while the 1990's where marked as a period in which liberals and socialists ran the country. The Reagan years here were mimicked by having a mix of christian and liberal politics, while during the 1970's, we had a government where socialists had the strongest position. So with the upcoming elections in the US, we will probably soon have another type of government too.

Though many of our liberal antics have a strong embedding in a century old culture, the last couple of years some developments show the climate is changing. Ever since the 1960's, due to pressures on the labour market, people from the Middle East and Northern Africa have been encouraged to come here and do the work Dutch rather not do themselves. For years this group kept quiet and was mainly neglected by the original Dutch population, but a new generation (second and third generation immigrants) feeling alienated from Dutch society is seeking pride and recognition, hence turning to radical Muslim movements. The polarization is further fueled by populist politicians who do well triggering racist feelings among many orginal Dutch. Most of these politicians eventually form their own parties, getting into conflict with the mainstream movements they originate from. They usually do extremely well in the polls for a while, getting lots of attention, support and oppostion, but their supporters are fickle and easily give their vote to yet another face, just as easily switching from extreme left-winged politics to extreme right-winged politics. All of these populist politicians consult the same spin-doctor, who learned his craft while working for the Guiliani campaign running for the NYC mayor office.

While at the moment there is a lot of attention towards the permissive side of Dutch society, I believe it will end up to be not much more than fine-tuning the rules and regulations, something which has to happen constantly anyway. When being permissive the risks of abusing the relative freedom is there, so fine tuning rules will always be part of the process. The liberal rules were never introduced to be permissive, but to be able to monitor what is really going on anyway. It would be stupid not to use the knowledge gained from that monitoring to make sure things don't get out of hand.

Growth and movement

What I loved most about The Netherlands was the contradictions.  On one hand, I saw there was prostitution, but it seems to be protected and regulated so women are not raped and robbed by Johns and pimps on the street, or impregnated by strangers, risking abortion or abandoned babies.  There are drugs but they are counted and qualified, and given certain specifications and guidelines... is this any different from our own FDA?

MOST impressive, and what is NOT seen in the USA, not in my neck of the woods, at least, was the rampant use of bicycles, the grouping of families, and the gathering of multi-generations in streets, stores and restaurants.  Most beautiful, however, was the closing of all these places at 6pm, due to an odd sense of "family-time" that exists in a country that has pot and prostitution in it's streets for foreigners to gawk at  and graze.

It's quite a country, that's for sure.

Down this road before

We've discussed drugs and pot campaigns before, http://poundpuplegacy.org/node/5267, and as long as we have religious leaders funding our politicians, moral money will always be backing our laws.

Look what has happened to our very own baby-stories!  Abortion verus adoption, anyone? 

Pact with the devil

If only it were the money of the religious leaders, but it is apparent corporate and religious America feed off of one another. Religious factions with their need to divide the world in "good" and "bad", need "bad" in order to maintain their position. So it is in their interest to have high crime rates, high rates of abortion, many family disruptions. Only in the presence of much that is "evil" do religious leaders have a point. Corporate America needs stable and growing markets, so it is not in their interest to solve certain problems. Rather than helping to prevent crime, corporate America has a bigger interest building and running prisons. Rather than preventing teen pregnancy, corporate America, sees an income in selling the resulting babies. The pharmaceutical industry fares best with as much misery as possible, so any measures aimed to make people happier will not meet their support. The military industry sees more income in fighting a war than in diplomatic solutions.

I believe it is this pact of the cynical corporate world and the misantropist religious world that is feeding the politics that keep from reaching for solutions.

Control

Though the outward looks of Amsterdam show a country that is highly permissive and a place where everything is allowed, in most every day Dutch life it doesn't play that big a role. In fact most Dutch people are pretty much family oriented and small town, for whom the most important question is the safety and well-being of their own. 

Being such a small country with so many people it is impossible to say: "not in my back yard". The entire country is more or less everybodies back yard, so the good, the bad and the ugly have to live together somehow. There simply is no room for ghettos, even though there are of course neighbourhoods that come close to being one. So where in other countries prostitution and drug dealing is covert and concentrated in bad neighbourhoods, here there is no such option. Besides we don't want to have really bad neighbourhoods here, both for humanitarian and monetary reasons (maintaining poverty is very expensive in the long run).

Contradictory as it may sound, the permissive attitude is eventually meant to gain more control. Instead of covering up "bad habits" and "immoral behaviour" it is prefered to regulate it and keep it visible.

Red light to the famed district?

Turn Out the Red Light?

http://www.newsweek.com/id/109373/page/1

Peter Dejong / AP
A woman waits in the window for customers in Amsterdam's famed Red Light District.

Amsterdam plans to close down its most famous district, citing sleaze, criminal activity and human trafficking. Not everybody is happy about it.

By Thijs Niemantsverdriet | Newsweek Web Exclusive

Feb 8, 2008 | Updated: 2:50  p.m. ET Feb 8, 2008

Two weeks ago a young Dutch fashion designer named Bas Kosters opened a new store. His colorful and sumptuous creations—skirts, handbags, sweatshirts—merit attention. But the most striking aspect of his new venue is the location. Kosters's work is on display in Amsterdam's Red Light District behind two tall windows that until recently were used as a brothel. The ladies have vanished. The red lights and curtains have been removed and replaced by Kosters's hyperfashionable clothes.

Kosters found this studio thanks to an ambitious plan by the Amsterdam city government. Arguing that too many brothels and sex bars are linked to criminality, the authorities plan to all but erase the Red Light District. If the plan goes through, the peep shows, sex shops and prostitute windows that line the small alleys and canals will have to go, giving way to galleries, boutiques and upscale restaurants and bars. Goodbye to the big neon signs advertising every possible form of sexual indulgence.

Amsterdam without the Red Light District? Wouldn't that be like Paris without the Eiffel Tower? Amsterdam's mayor, Job Cohen, and his aldermen have demonstrated little nostalgia for the district, which has been the world's most famous home of sexual permissiveness since the 15th century. They first unveiled the plan to close it in December; last month they revoked the licenses of two widely known sex venues, the Casa Rosso and the Banana Bar. The next step is to buy out the real estate owners. Last fall the city struck a deal with a powerful brothel owner, Charles Geerts (known as "Fat Charlie"), to buy 20 buildings.

The driving force behind the cleanup is Lodewijk Asscher. A young star of the Dutch Labour Party and deputy mayor of Amsterdam, Asscher believes it's time to deliver his hometown from sleaze—even if he's scuppering a $100 million-a-year industry in the process. He is pleasantly surprised, he says, by the public support he's gotten for the plan. "Every day I get e-mails," he says. A recent survey confirms the sentiment: the city administration's polling agency found that 67 percent of Amsterdam's population supports a clampdown on sketchy business. The Amsterdam City Council approved the plan about two weeks ago by an overwhelming 43-2 majority.

But not everybody is happy about the change. Jan Broers, owner of Royal Taste, a hotel in the heart of the Red Light District, and eight prostitute windows, has formed a protest committee called Platform 1012 (named after the area's ZIP code). He claims to have collected thousands of signatures. This week the group staged a protest march, starting in front of the Casa Rosso and ending in Dam Square, where thousands of people shared a minute of silence. They carried pink balloons and signs saying "Hands off the Red Light District" and a poster of Asscher doctored to look as if he was with a street hooker.

Broers is afraid that fewer tourists will come to a sexless Amsterdam, harming legitimate, legal businesses. Most of all, he says, he feels "stigmatized" by the city government. "With all his rhetoric, deputy mayor Asscher is giving the district a bad name throughout the world," he says. "People phone me up from abroad every day, worried we might be gone already." Broers questions the city's premise that prostitution leads to criminal activities in the area. Indeed, the city, which is acting under laws that require only a suspicion of criminal activity, can point only to studies from the mid-1990s. "It's a shield. The city just wants to gentrify the neighborhood, so they can make some good money. And they're using public funds to buy all the real estate."

And what about the ladies? The Red Light District has about 450 windows where women offer their services. The majority of those will be closed down. Where will the inhabitants go, once they're forced out of work? Asscher says most of the prostitutes are part of international human-trafficking networks that draw on women from Eastern Europe, and they will most likely move on to Antwerp, Hamburg and other European cities. For those that remain, the city administration may start certifying pimps and require that prostitutes who work for them to be 21 years old.

The Dutch Sex Workers Union fears that many women and girls will be forced to start walking the streets. On its Web site the union calls the city's plans to certify pimps "bizarre." Since prostitution has been legal in the Netherlands since 2000, it argues, sex workers don't need pimps to find a place to work. Ruth Hopkins, a Dutch-English investigative journalist who has written extensively on prostitution in Amsterdam, says the city government overstates the extent of involuntary prostitution. "Even though there are gangs of pimps, a lot of women, mostly Africans and Latinos, do their work in complete independence," she says. Hopkins fears that a cleaned-up Amsterdam will be a boring city.

The crackdown fits into a nationwide backlash against the excesses of 1960s "happy-clappy" liberalism, as a conservative Dutch member of parliament recently put it. Over the last few years the Netherlands has adopted a stricter policy on selling marijuana, and a ban on hallucinogenic mushrooms is slated to go into effect later this year. "People in Amsterdam and the rest of the country are starting to discern real tolerance from bogus tolerance," says Asscher. "When Rudy Giuliani started to clean up Times Square in the mid-'90s, some people were warning that no one would ever again want to come to New York City. But as far as I know, it has had record tourist numbers each year since." Perhaps Giuliani, who this week dropped out of the U.S. presidential race, should run for office in the Netherlands.

© 2008 Newsweek, Inc.

Independence

Though Mr. Guiliani has been a successful mayor of New York City, I would hope he'd stay in the USA and not seek refuge over here. We certainly have had enough American influence on politics here, especially over the last seven years, with our Harry Potter prime minister, who like Tony Blair in the UK, has done his utmost to be a good boy with the Bush Administration. All too happy with every photo-op, with the US prez, he never failed to prove having a blind eye towards the wrongs done in God's name. Harry Potter is of course a good christian boy, for whom everything coming from God's own country must be golden. The influence on our politics has been notable and like the UK it took the labour party to collaborate in getting more and more strict. While almost all European countries look towards the Netherlands as a role model in pragmatic liberalism, we seem to be ashamed of our heritage when forced to explain it to the theocratic forces at the other end of the pond. I believe we should trust in our own strength and not become a vassal of any other country.

Ironic twist

I loved this statement:  I believe we should trust in our own strength and not become a vassal of any other country.

Given American History and the Revolutionary War, such "independent thinking" indeed seems to threaten many. 

Why is it so difficult to accept change and deviation?  Is this a moral issue, or a control issue?

in or out

Mr. Balkenende, our Harry Potter look alike prime minister, seems to long back to a time in history he never consciously experienced. As such it seems the 1950's to him have a magical appeal of a time in which everything was still morally sound and simple. In all reality, everything that happens now happened too in that period, only more covert. There was abortion in the 50's, only more dangerous, there was prostitution in the 50's, only more covert and abusive. People like Harry Potter seem to think by punishing "immoral" behaviour it will go away, while it only creates in-group/out-group dynamics, reducing society to nobles and rascals. The likes of HP, of course always being noble, while having friends in their crony network filling their pockets with the revenues of treating the symptoms.

Pocket-fillers

This reminds me very much of our own system where Mantatory Minimums have become very popular. 

It seems to me, more attention is given to the revenue, and not at all the people being affected by the controlling powers of those who want to dominate.

I've been to Amsterdam a few

I've been to Amsterdam a few times first when I was 19 and again two more times in my mid 20's i've quit smoking and don't go for that or the redlight district but would hate to see it go I really love the city and the netherlands in general there's no question its all tourist areas especially the independent escorts and brothels but there's not much that should change about that.